Talvar

<p>Fourteen-year-old Shruti Tandon has been found dead at her home in Sameer Vihar in by her parents, Ramesh and Nutan, during the night of 15–16 March 2008. The local police initially look for Khempal, the missing servant but his decomposed body is later found on the terrace of the building where the Tandons live. The police question Kanhaiya, Khempal’s close friend and the Tandons’ assistant who says that Khempal might have been involved in a sexual relationship with Shruti. They begin to suspect the Tandons, and declare the murders a clear case of . On 25 March, the Noida police arrest Ramesh for the murders. The police chief organises a press conference, at which he says that Ramesh murdered Shruti and Khempal after he found them in a compromising position attributing this to honour killing. The of Shruti leads to public outrage, and the case is given to Joint Director Ashwin Kumar of the Central Department of Investigation (CDI) and Vedant. Kumar is contemptuous of the sloppy first responders, who botched the initial crime-scene investigation. He believes that the parents are innocent, and methodically builds a case against the father’s resentful assistant. His team uses in their attempt to prove that the assistant (and two accomplices) committed the murders. Kumar exonerates the parents on 22 June 2008, and Ramesh is released from jail. As Kumar is about to conclude his investigation, his senior officer retires and is replaced by a new CDI chief. ACP Vedant, eager to receive a promotion, begins working against Kumar. This leads to an altercation between the two officers, which results in Kumar’s suspension. The CDI gives the case to a new investigative team led by Kumar’s former superior, Paul, who concludes that the parents committed the murders. Both investigative teams, with opposing hypotheses, make their cases to the CDI chief. The CDI files a closure report in the court naming the parents as prime suspects, but the evidence is insufficient to prosecute. The Tandons file a protest plea against the CDI report. The judge rejects the closure report, and accuses the parents in the case. The trial begins on 8 June 2012, and the Tandons are convicted of the murders several months later. Filmmaker and composer was impressed by director after seeing the 2007 anthology film, (in which she directed one segment), and expressed his wish to produce a film with her. Meghna said that she was “beginning to wonder what to do next” when she had the conversation with Bhardwaj, and they came up with the idea of making a film about the . Bhardwaj and Meghna researched the case for nearly two years and found “several bizarre contradictions and each view had their own conviction”. They decided to present three perspectives in the story: the police investigation, the first probe and an investigation by a different CBI team. Bhardwaj and Meghna did not yet obtain permission from the Talwar family for the film. Meghna was fascinated by the idea of exploring the “unfinished-ness” of the case. In January 2015, it was announced that the Talwar couple (who were in prison) had approved the film. Bhardwaj, who wrote and produced the film, said that he was influenced by the (in which the same event is given different interpretations by the individuals involved). According to Meghna, she tried to keep the narrative as objective as possible to let the viewer interpret it on their own. The names of individuals and organisations were changed in the film to avoid legal issues. At a screening, lawyer and politician , said that the trial depicted in the film was inaccurate. Meghna responded, “[The film] is more about the investigation than about the trial. In fact, the trial is not part of the film at all. It tracks the many investigations.” The first draft of the screenplay was written in a year, and it took more time to convince those involved in the investigation to participate. Aarushi’s aunt, Vandana Talwar (who began a campaign to prove the parents’ innocence), provided some material to Bhardwaj. Some of the documents provided to Bhardwaj were firsthand accounts by Rajesh and Nupur Talwar. Earlier entitled , the film was renamed . The title was initially registered with Pritish Nandy Communications (PNC), but was purchased by Bhardwaj. PNC was the film’s initial co-producer, but the company withdrew from the project. About the film’s title, Meghna said that it referred to justice: ” alludes to the sword that is held in the hand of the lady of justice.” She also said that the film would serve its purpose if it begins a debate about re-examining the case. Bhardwaj was driven to write the script after an encounter with the case’s first investigating officer: “There was a kind of black humour that was coming out of this tragedy. I am a great fan of . I found the best way to write the script in it”. He was troubled by the fact that people talked about Aarushi’s death, but paid little attention to her parents. Meghna and Bhardwaj began researching the case in mid-2012, during the trial. Bhardwaj said that although he took “some liberties with the script”, he did not meddle with the story. About the film’s purpose, Meghna said that a number of people “knew something about the case, but they didn’t know everything about it or remember it”. She said that the film brings out the different aspects of the case. Research continued while the film was being shot because of changes on the set or in a scene. Meghna obtained the Talwars’ side of the story from a meeting with Rajesh Talwar’s brother and sister-in-law, Dinesh Talwar and his wife Vandana; afterwards, she said that she “did not feel the need to meet the Talwars”. Alisha Parveen Khan played Shruti Tandon, a role based on Arushi Talwar. was approached by casting director, who told her about a role based on Nupur Talwar which attracted her. She said she enjoyed the script, and agreed to do the film after meeting Meghna. Sharma did not research her role (she felt that the script was “well researched”), and said that her character was about “portraying guilt and innocence according to perceptions.” In November 2013, it was announced that was cast in the film. Khan did not know about the case in detail before the film. His character was based on CBI officer Arun Kumar, whom he met in preparation for the film, and he was the only actor approached to play the role. Khan agreed to do the film because he considered the story “near and frightening”, and the film was not sensationalised: “It is an important case, and whatever you may think about the verdict, the film gives us a chance to look at our system and how different departments deal with a crisis.” , who played Aarushi’s father (Rajesh Talwar) in the film, said: “You are making a film about people who are alive and are suffering, you have to be extremely sensitive”. made a three-minute appearance in the film as Khan’s wife. Principal photography began a year later (in June 2014) on location in Mumbai, Delhi and Noida, and lasted almost a year. According to Meghna, filming was a “hugely draining” experience. The script was based on material in the public domain, and she called it her “most fragile film”. Several scenes were filmed in a house identical to the Talwars’, a few blocks away. Meghna said that the most difficult part for her was filming the murder scenes; although there were different weapons and different killers from different perspectives, the “one[s] to die w[ere] always the girl and the man, which did not change”. Pankaj Kumar was director of photography, and A. Sreekar Prasad edited the film. The film’s music was composed by , with lyrics by . The album consisted of four songs, with vocals by , , and . It was released on 16 September 2015 on the label. The score was composed by Ketan Sodha. premiered under the title at ‘s special presentation on 14 September 2015, and was screened at the 2015 and the . The film’s trailer was released on 22 August 2015, followed by two posters featuring and Khan. The film was released on 625 screens throughout India on 2 October 2015. Paid previews were organized a day before its public release. A special screening for celebrities was presented several days after its release. , the second 2015 film based on the case (the first was ), was released on DVD on 24 November 2015 and is also available on . received a positive critical reception. On the website , 91% of 22 critics’ reviews are positive, with an average rating of 6.9/10. Rajyasree Sen of Firstpost called the film a “must see whodunnit” with a “gritty documentary feel”. Saibal Chatterjee of praised its writing and performances, calling it a “gripping, genre-defying and non-exploitative cinematic examination” of the murder case. Srijana Mitra Das of wrote, ” … is super-sharp, a sword swipe at Bollywood’s song-and-dance, mehendi-fuelled escapism.” called the film a “gripping, then baffling, and ultimately disturbing account” of the murder, “deliberately unsentimental and melodrama-free”. Sneha May Francis of praised Sharma and Kabi, expressing that they “play the parents impressively, with restrained perfection”. Shilpa Jamkhandikar of noted that it is a “well-constructed, gripping film”, but the filmmakers’ bias about the case left a “bitter aftertaste”. Nandini Ramnath of felt the film was a “slickly produced, tightly written and beautifully performed true crime documentary”; she also called a “legal petition disguised as a movie”, whose sole purpose was to request the authorities to reconsider the case. Aseem Chhabra of observed: “very uncomfortable film to watch”: “A good film should be able to get into our skin, challenge us, shake us up and does all of that.” praising Khan’s performance, said that his character’s “commitment and comic timing” were rare in Hindi films. of described its “solid writing, sharp dialogue and the spot-on performances” as the strengths. She praised its humour in the face of a serious investigation, which gave the film a “nice touch”. Sarit Ray of mentioned “shakes you up and forces you to think”. He praised the “believable and flawed” character of Ashwini, who “drinks on the sly, out of bottles wrapped in paper bags, and distractedly plays Snakes on his phone while a parent sobs” instead of being a “punchline-spewing hero figure”. Shubhra Gupta of thought that it was “a brave film that devastates, and despite its flaws, makes for a compelling watch.” wrote in his review: “A tightly-coiled procedural made with such dryness that it seems, in parts, documentarian – resembling a reenactment more than a feature film”. Deepanjana Pal said that was more of a “much-needed social document than a film”, and its “direction lacks imagination”. Anuj Kumar of reviewed, “Its intentions might be blunt but as a piece of cinema Talvar is a sharp procedural.” Uday Bhatia of praised its performances and Bhardwaj’s screenplay: “A taut film on the Noida double homicide, built around an exceptional screenplay”. According to Sonia Chopra of , the film was a “perfect balance of sobriety and cruelly dark humour.” Among overseas reviewers, of labelled the screenplay “solidly constructed” and the film’s narrative flow “satisfyingly brisk”. J. Hurtado of wrote, ” makes for gripping, infuriating, and at times illuminating viewing, and it’s a film that will translate just as well to those ignorant with the case as to those intimately involved.” Deborah Young of gave the film a positive review, naming it “gripping from start to finish.” Rachel Saltz of noted Khan’s performance as the “movie’s best weapon”: “Playing a familiar character type, the world-weary detective, he gives a performance, full of small, sly details, that doesn’t seem familiar at all.” was filmed on a budget of (US$1.8 million). Released with and , the film made (US$350,000) at the box office on the opening day. and earned (US$59,000) from the paid preview before its theatrical release. It earned (US$320,000) and (US$390,000) on Saturday and Sunday, respectively, for a total of (US$1.1 million) on its opening weekend. grossed (US$2.7 million) during its first ten days and, by the end of its theatrical run, earned a worldwide gross of (US$5.4 million). At the , Bhardwaj received the and Sanjay Kurian the award. At the , A. Sreekar Prasad received the award and the award.</p>