Salaam Bombay!

<p>Before the start of the film, Krishna has set fire to his elder brother’s motorbike in retaliation for being bullied by him. His angry mother has taken him to the nearby Apollo Circus and told him that he can only come home when he has earned 500 rupees to pay for the damage. Krishna agrees and starts working for the circus. The film begins as the circus is packing up to move on to its next site. His boss asks him to run an errand, but when Krishna returns, he finds that the circus has left. Alone, with nowhere to go and without the money to repay his mother, he travels to the nearest big city, Bombay. As soon as he arrives, he is robbed of his few possessions. He follows the thieves, befriends them, and ends up in the city’s notorious red-light area of , near the . One of the thieves, Chillum, a drug pusher and addict, helps Krishna get a job at the Grant Road Tea Stall and becomes a mentor of sorts to him. Baba, a local drug dealer, employs addicts like Chillum. Baba’s wife, Rekha, is a prostitute, and they have a little daughter, Manju. Rekha is annoyed that she has to raise her daughter in such an environment. Baba had promised to start a new life elsewhere, but it is a promise that Baba cannot or will not fulfill. Krishna gets a new name “Chaipau” and learns to live with it. His goal is still to raise the money he needs to return home, but he soon finds out that saving money in his new surroundings is next to impossible. To make matters worse, he has a crush on a teenage girl named “Sola Saal” (meaning “sixteen years”), who has been recently sold to the brothel. He sets fire to her room and attempts to escape with her, but they are caught. The fire causes Krishna to get a severe beating, while Sola Saal, who is considered valuable since she is still a virgin, denies starting the fire and tearfully tries to resist her enslavement. The madame of the house asks Baba to “tame her,” which Baba agrees to do. Meanwhile, Krishna, as well as working at the tea stall, works odd jobs to save some money and help Chillum, who cannot survive without drugs, especially after being sacked by Baba after a disastrous interview with a foreign journalist. Eventually, one of these odd jobs costs Krishna his job at the tea stall. To get more money, Krishna and his pals rob an elderly Parsi man by breaking into his house in broad daylight. Krishna eventually finds out that the money he had saved has been stolen by Chillum for drugs, which Chillum had overdosed on and died. One night, while returning home from work with friends, Krishna and Manju are apprehended by the police and taken to a juvenile home. Krishna escapes and goes back to his world. He finds that a new recruit in Baba’s drug business has taken Chillum’s place and name. Krishna meets Sola Saal and tries to convince her to run away with him. She reveals that she is charmed by Baba and no longer interested in Krishna; she is driven away to service her first ‘client’. Meanwhile, Rekha is told that the authorities will not release their daughter because the mother is a prostitute. An angry Rekha decides to leave Baba, but Baba beats her in retaliation. She is saved by the timely intervention of Krishna who, in a fit of rage, kills Baba and attempts to run away with her, but they become separated in a parade honoring Ganesh. The film ends with a slow zoom in on Krishna’s dejected face. Nair records that the initial inspiration for the film came from the spirit of Bombay’s street children. Her ideas developed when she researched the lives of the children with her creative partner . From the beginning, they decided that real street children would play in the film since the combination of childhood and knowledge in their faces would be hard to find among professional child actors. Nair was also inspired to make the film after watching ‘s (1981). She said, “on the first day of shooting, I received the news that the child actor who played the character of was shot dead in the street. After this incident, I was more determined to make , and decided to share the film’s dividends with street children if we could.” After making four , was Nair’s first full-length . Most of the film was shot on Falkland Road, a in , Bombay. The child actors in the film were real street children. The cast received drama training at a workshop in Bombay before they appeared in the film. Dinaz Stafford, a child psychologist, found the children, worked with them and assisted in the acting workshop run by Barry John. A room was rented near the for rehearsals, where about 130 children rehearsed on the first day. Later, before appearing in the film, a group of 24 street children trained in a workshop, where they were given music, dance and acting training. Gradually the stories of the city of Bombay, their parents, sex, trafficking, drug dealing, gangs and their profiteering were learned from them. Some were reunited with their families before the film was shot. They were paid, had medical treatment, and some of that money was left as a fixed deposit. played the role of a letter writer in a two-minute scene in the film, which was his first appearance in a film. After its release, director Nair with Dinaz Stafford established an organization called the in 1989 to rehabilitate the children who appeared in the film. The Salaam Baalak Trust now lends support to street children in Bombay, and . Shafiq Sayed, who played Krishna in the film, is currently living as an driver in Bangalore. Initially, Cadrage, , , , and the paid for the production of the film. Several producers co-produced the film with Nair, with Gabriel Auer from France as the executive producer, from the UK and Anil Tejani from India and Cherry Rogers as the co-executive producers. Also in co-production were Jane Balfour and co-producer . , of the film was composed, performed, and directed by , was released on cassette and CD versions in 1986 from DRG Music Publishing. The song “Mera Naam Chin Chin Choo” was written by , composed by and sung by for the 1958 film is included in the film soundtrack. Also in a scene at the movie theatre, ‘s dance to the song “Hawa Hawaii” sung by from the 1987 film is performed. All music is composed by L. Subramaniam, composed by Qamar Jalalabadi / O. P. Nayyar. Before commercial release, the film premiered at the at the in May 1988. It was later screened at the on 13 September in 1988. In 1988, the film was released on 24 August in , on September in , on 7 October at the 26th , on 20 December in , and on 22 December in . Following year, the film was released on 13 January in , 2 February in , on 10 February in , on 27 April in , on 29 June in , on 27 July in , on 24 September at the Cinefest Sudbury International Film Festival in and 3 November in . In 1990, the film was released on 26 January in , on 10 March in , and on 5 April in . Following year, the film was released on 18 January in . earned in the and , from 506,100 ticket sales. In , the film sold 633,899 tickets; the average ticket price in 1988 was 34 , which is equivalent to 21,552,566 francs ( ). In , the film sold 258,728 tickets; the average ticket price in 1989 was 9.5 , which is equivalent to 2,457,916 DM ( ). The average exchange rate in 1988 was 1 US dollar equal to 1.585 , which is worth . The film also sold 346 tickets in Switzerland and Spain since 1996, adding up to total overseas footfalls of 1,399,073 tickets sold in the United States, France, Germany, Switzerland and Spain. Against a production budget of $450,000, the film grossed an estimated total of in overseas markets, becoming one of the at that time. The average exchange rate in 1988 was 1 US dollar equal to , which is equivalent to (equivalent to 1.2 billion or US$14 million in 2023). The film was re-released in France on 12 December 2001 and 7 January 2015. In 2005, it was also screened at the in Poland on 23 July. The film was re-released in Indian theatres in March 2013. In 2015, at the , the film was screened on 9 October, and on 18 October at the in the United States. “In that respect is quite different from , the 1981 film about Brazilian street children. Although the two films obviously have much in common, the children of exist in an anarchic and savage world, while those in “Salaam Bombay!” share a community, however humble.” mainly received positive reviews from critics who commented on the cultural and social impact of the film. On the film website , the film has an approval rating of 93% based on 30 reviews, with a of 7.8/10. The site’s critical consensus reads, ” examines life in a part of the world that many viewers have never visited – but does so with enough compassion and grace to make them feel as if they have.” At , which assigns a weighted mean rating to reviews, the film has a score of 78 based on 4 critics, indicating “generally favorable reviews”. wrote, “The history of the making of “Salaam Bombay!” is almost as interesting as the film itself.” English writer commented, “A warm and lively film, made by Mira Nair with only a handful of professional actors.” Ted Shen of wrote that, “like ‘s the film is unsparingly gritty, but with a woman’s tenderness it also grants the characters an occasional moment of grace.” of magazine wrote that, ” deserves a broad audience, not just to open American eyes to plights of hunger and homelessness abroad, but to open American minds to the vitality of a cinema without rim shots and happy endings.” American film critic stated, “Much to Nair`s credit, she exploits neither the exoticism of her locale (there are no tour-guide, look-at-this flourishes) nor the misery of her subjects (suffer they may, but they do not demand pity).” American film critic stated, “the movie is terrifically well-acted and beautifully filmed, however, marking an auspicious feature-film debut for Indian-American director Mira Nair.” commented that “poetic, powerful and disturbing, transcends language and cultural barriers. , thought that the film “drew its intensity and colour from its locale, the slums of Bombay.” says, “for a film about such hopelessness, is surprisingly cheering.” wrote, “with Salaam, Nair proves an early ability with a camera and at getting performances out of obviously inexperienced actors, but her writing talents are much sketchier.” Rita Kempley of wrote, “Nair’s film has been compared to Hector Babenco’s chilling “Pixote,” a Brazilian look at a 10-year-old street criminal, but hers is a more compassionate, though equally troubling, portrait.” On movie review site critic commented, “still brilliant in 25 years.”</p>