Rasikkum Seemane

<p>The film starts with two 10-year-old boys, Nandhu and Aravind, arguing heatedly about Gayathri and who loves her the most. As the young girl herself remarks, they are all only in seventh standard, and claims she will only fall in love with whoever happens to become a doctor. In the meantime, Gayathri’s father is transferred elsewhere, while Nandhu’s father commits suicide after killing his mother. Nandhu is taken care of his father’s closest friend and as he cannot afford to help the kid become a doctor, he hatches a plan to become a professional blackmailer. 12 years later, Nandhu is a student and professional blackmailer, now operating under the aegis of his guru and his associate. Until Gayathri re-emerges, but for Nandhu’s distraught, she has already met Aravind, who actually has become a doctor. Realisation comes to Nandhu slowly, but when all his plans to stop them falling in love backfire, he decides to take some drastic action, blackmailing her into eloping with him, but it never occurs to him to marry her. The film was initially titled , but was changed after it elicited opposition. Navya Nair, previously known for playing ” ” roles, attempted to break that mould by portraying a glamorous character. Leema Babu made her debut in the film, portraying the younger version of Nair’s character. Production was completed in 2008. The soundtrack was composed by . The title track is a remix of the similarly named song from . of wrote, “Vijay Antony is definitely capable of better stuff, but in Rasikkum Seemaane’s soundtrack, his music is plain atrocious!”. The film was released on 12 February 2010. Pavithra Srinivasan of said the film “lacks substance” with “pot-holes the size of craters, uninspired acting and dull music”, the film falls “after the first half-hour”. In regard to the performances, the review claims that Nair and Arvind Akash try “valiantly to act despite clichéd dialogues, weird situations and commercial twists” whilst Srikanth tries “very hard, but looks constipated”. The review also criticises the director claiming that the script had “potential” but “every intriguing plot-twist turns into a damp squib”.</p>