Meenda Sorgam

<p>Nirmala is a poor but talented dancer who falls in love with Sekar, a rich man’s son. But Sekar is forced into a marriage with Prathiba, a rich man’s spoilt daughter. Inconsolable, Nirmala promises her lover that she will never give public performances. Due to various circumstances, Sekar’s finances suffer losses and his house is put up for auction. To rescue him from a dire future, Nirmala breaks her promise and gives a dance performance. With the money thus earned, she saves his house. But Sekar is unaware of this. When he learns the truth, he begins searching for her. In the meantime, Prathiba, who is now reformed, commits suicide. Sekar locates Nirmala, who is on the verge of committing suicide, and they are reunited. Madhuram Pictures initially began a film called ( ) with and starring. penned the script for that film; however the film was dropped after the first filming schedule due to Saroja’s pregnancy. The company decided to make a new film and chose as director and and as lead actors. However Raghunath wanted Rajendran as the lead and left the film due to uncertainty in finalising the lead actor which led the film’s crew to insist Sridhar to direct this film. The film was produced by T. A. Dorairajan, cinematography was handled by , and editing by N. M. Shankar. , a relative of Sridhar, joined the film as an assistant director, making this the first of many collaborations between him and Sridhar. Music was composed by and lyrics were written by , Subbu Arumugam and P. S. Gopalakrishnan. Sridhar signed on Rao as the composer after working with him in (1956). He initially wanted to write the lyrics, but could not hire the poet due to his death. The song “Kalaiyae En Vazhkaiyin” is set to raga, and “Aadum Arul Jothi” is set to . was released on 29 July 1960. In the promotional posters, Sridhar was billed as “Kalaignar Thilakam” without his consent, which angered him. The title was previously bestowed upon him by the Madurai Students’ Federation soon after the success of (1959). praised the performances of the cast, particularly Ganesan, Padmini and Thangavelu, along with Vincent’s cinematography. Kanthan of appreciated Ganesan’s performance, but felt it lacked newness, though the film could be watched more than once. According to historian , the film did not succeed commercially, as it was thought to be too highbrow and idealistic.</p>