Taj Mahal

<p>Thiruppaachi and Sengulam are neighbouring villages with a history of enmity between them. Maayan and Machakanni meet on the day of her engagement and it is . Her marriage itself gets called off when the groom and his family insult Machakanni’s family and her romance with Maayan continues. However, when her brother finds out about him, all hell breaks loose. The turned-down bridegroom is still itching for revenge and figuring out that the only way to extract it is to marry Machakanni. He pleads for forgiveness and succeeds in melting her brother’s heart. The marriage is finalised but Maayan’s friends swear to unite the star-crossed lovers. There is also a subplot of Maayan’s aunt trying to get her daughter married off to Maayan. introduced his son Manoj as an actor with the film, stating that his son should appear as an actor before fulfilling his dreams of working as a part of the crew. , daughter of Hindi actress was signed on to play the leading female role. Leading film-maker wrote the story for the film, while was also involved in initial script discussions but opted out after the film became a village-centric project. was signed to score the music while veteran cinematographers and also signed the project, ending a long hiatus in Tamil films. The team started pre-production work in late 1997 and shooting began in 1998, with the project becoming Janani Cine Arts’ most expensive production to date. During production, Bharathiraja considered giving his son a stage name of Manibharathi, but ultimately opted against doing so. An exact replica of the was created on in Chennai for a song sequence. The film was shot across areas including Kulu Manali, Badhami, Hampi, Bellari and Poomparai. The soundtrack features 10 songs composed by A. R. Rahman and lyrics by . The album marked Rahman’s fourth collaboration with Bharathiraja. The songs were noted for the extensive use of traditional instruments. Rahman introduced several singers into the Tamil music scene, the most notable being . He sang a style song “Thirupaachi”. Suchitra Lata of wrote “Rahman’s music is aptly bare for the village setting; it has energy and is warmly stylised by an orchestra of the cello, violins and drums.” The film was initially slated to face a box office battle with several other big films, notably , , , and , but the delay of the first three gave a possible leeway to become a success. Despite this, the film became a box office failure and Manoj’s career failed to take off despite a high-profile launch. Journalists attributed the film’s failure to the use of artificial sets to depict villages, in contrast to Bharathiraja’s penchant for authenticity and realism, while Bharathiraja blamed it on Rahman’s music. Irrespective of the film’s performance, in 2004 Riya Sen regarded as showcasing the best role in her career to that point. The film was set to be dubbed and released in Telugu, but the financial losses suffered had deterred the version. Manoj won the Dinakaran Cinema Award for Best Newface Actor. G. Ulaganathan of said that was “vintage Bharatiraja at his best”, while also adding that Riya Sen “shines in spite of an alien language and the totally strange cultural milieu in which she is placed”. Ulaganathan added that “song picturisation is brilliant and Revathy and Radhika, both favourite ex-heroines of the director, put up an impressive show.” He also said the “only eyesore is hero Manoj” and that Bharathiraja “has been a little over-ambitious here and could have edited at least 20% of the film, including many unnecessary action scenes.” Aurangazeb of panned the acting of the lead pair but praised the acting of other actors, Rahman’s music, Kannan’s cinematography and felt the film lacked the realism of Bharathiraja’s previous films and concluded saying this film is not an eternal love, it is a love that chases away. K. N. Vijiyan of wrote, “Though the story may not be new, it should be a treat for young lovers and Bharathiraaja fans”. Malathi Rangarajan of lauded Kannan’s cinematography, Bharathiraja’s screenplay and Rahman’s music but criticised the story for lacking novelty.</p>